Thursday 30 August 2007

TAYLOR DEUPREE + CHRISTOPHER WILLITS ::: LISTENING GARDEN



some sublime electronics here too. i particularly liked track 4 - a different kind of prescence, warmer, and fragile also - but they're all good, in a minimal ambient kind of way. is the verb ambient still valid? i hope so, and hope that it hasnt been hijacked by the likes of zero 7 and such like......

http://www.12k.com/line/

http://www.12k.com/line/mp3s/listeninggarden_excerpt.mp3

Level Aeus parts one and two




beautiful minimalism. Level's Barry Nichols explores the spaces between the sounds, the silence and decay, rendering a sublime collection of pieces.

watch for a forthcoming interview with Bary........

http://www.myspace.com/sicomm

http://www.smallfish.co.uk

www.spekk.net

estate hits back at widdecombe



(picture Charlie Varley, unrelated in the literal sense but maybe poetically related, http://varleypix.com/ )

great stuff. kicking against the pricks, so to speak. who the f^%k does Ann Widdecombe think she is? she certainly has no perception of irony.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gbX_wCHlzo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKUfZDTIRY8&NR=1

Londonstani ::: Guatam Malkanni ::: 4th Estate ( June 2006 )

June 2006

Londonstani ::: Guatam Malkanni ::: 4th Estate

A long time ago in a galaxy far far away, a band released an album called ‘Wasted Youth Club Classics’. That band was Glamourous Hooligan, and this book starts with a scene that could be inspired by that sort of braggadocio. Indeed, the cover of said album features three young men, their faces shrouded and abstracted by their sunglasses and their scarfs, in a ‘band’ photo that’s off centre by about twenty degrees. Possibly the kind of sartorial vibe given off by the protagonists of the novel, four young men called Hardjit, Ravi, Amit and Jas.

“Slamming school for a whole term – Your first collar for lifting”
(sleeve notes ‘Wasted Youth Club Classics’)

Which is where Hardjit, Ravi, Amit and Jas have been, and nearly been. Save for the intervention of a well meaning teacher. The story turns on this incident and continues into an intensifying trajectory which takes in a lot.

Characters exist in an ‘adolescent’ environment, trying on different identities whilst existing in parallel universes - modulated by technologies such as mobile phones, their mother’s BMW’s, the cultural space - that are in close proximity to their parents. It’s a lot about that space, and the dynamics of the group.

Much of the novel is relayed via the interior monologue of Jas, and it is this that gives the book much of it’s gravity:

“The Bollywood hero always takes care a the underdog, you see. Only difference was that Hardjit din’t like takin no glory for stickin up for me. He din’t even like it whenever I thanked him for doing so. I reckon he was basically so freaked out by how gimpy I was that he felt he’d got to cure me. Like those people who are so homophobic that stead a beating gay guys shitless, they actually try an turn em into straight guys.”

And,

“I din’t know what sixty-nine meant, you see. I thought they were chattin bout the bus that goes down Chiswick, the one you take if you go to Brentford. I couldn’t even ask for a bloody bus ticket. Obviously I couldn’t. You can’t pull if you can’t talk, can you? Not unless you’re that Hugh fuckin Grant from that movie bout shaadis an funerals an shit. Always sayin sorry an erm and stuff. He still got his dick sucked, din’t he? It was on the news. Hugh Grant. Ponce.”

The book follows Jas as he negotiates the humiliations of adolescence, except that it ramps up a bit more towards the end. The perspective is further reinforced by the dynamic between the interior thoughts and the dialogue of the gang…..

“I know what other poncey words like homophobic an misogynist mean an I know that shit in’t right. But what am I s’posed to do bout it? If I don’t speak proply using the proper words then these guys’d say I was actin like a batty boy or a woman or a woman actin like a batty boy. One good thing though: now that I use all these proper words I’m hardly ever stuck for words. I just chuck in a bit o proper speakan I sound like I’m talkin’ proper, talkin like Hardjit. I just wish I was the Proper Word Inventor so I could pick different proper words, that’s all.”

“All those little flickers. Everyone has ‘em, no point in getting all sentimental….Be young, be foolish, but be angry, and remember that once you’ve left the Wasted Youth Club you can never go back!”
(sleeve notes ‘Wasted Youth Club Classics’)

‘Don’t perish in the pit of reason with the dogs of because”
(label notes, ‘Wasted Youth Club Classics’);

I watched ‘Kidulthood’ and ‘Deliverance’ the same day I wrote this: they resonated with the flow of scenes within this book, and I couldn’t help but feel that maybe there’s a nascent film in here: maybe the thought’s just a compliment to the writing.

BG.

Tuesday 14 August 2007

The Birth of Graffiti ::: John Naar ::: Prestel



The Faith of Graffiti, re-issued with more photographs in addition to the original ones used. All very sharp delicious 35mm – I presume – photographs: the colour tone is sumptuous and the books landscape format helps the display of them also.

There are two essays re-introducing the work, one by ‘cultural critic’ Sacha Jenkins – ‘In a War Zone Wide Awake’ - and one by John Naar himself, - ‘On becoming a Graffiti Photographer’. Naar’s one details how he started out as an artist working in the medium of photography, taking pictures of what held his interest in the city, for example images that were eerily reminiscent of other artworks. He developed his interest via the spontaneous collages that posters sometimes became, before moving onto tagging via the dual shooting of both a poster and a tag in 1972. He was fortunate to have been engaged by a UK publisher Pentagram, and the publisher Lawrence Schiller engaged Norman Mailer to write the text. This book became ‘The Faith of Graffiti’, published in 1974.

‘The Birth of Graffiti’ shows the originals and more of Naars’ three thousand shots he took over a two week period at the end of 1973. For what its worth – and I think it’s worth a great deal – the Faith of Graffiti was to originally be titled ‘Watching My Name Go By’. It somehow feels very important to point out that the work is incredibly political – witness the two yellow tags on a tree on page 138, and the contrast with the municipal benches of similar colours to the left of the photograph - since this can somehow be easily missed viewing the work from the comfort of one’s armchair, as contrasted with actually doing the stuff under fear of arrest or worse

Wednesday 8 August 2007

Bring The Noise ::: Simon Reynolds ::: Faber and Faber

Reviews of Husker Du, The Smiths, Public Enemy, Dinosaur Jr, The Pixies, post-rock and Pavement, Blur vs Oasis, Radiohead, 2-step and UK garage, electronica, Mike Skinner, grime, Dizzee Rascal and so on, all holding the mans customary depth and astuteness, displayed in the contextual and psychological analysis of the music and the musicians. I thought that this man should have been a psychiatrist after reading his piece on Morrissey in ‘Blissed Out’: he is a strong philosopher of contemporary culture who is in danger of being overlooked by the wider world. Reynolds lives mostly in NYC nowdays and writes for a number of publications both here and there, such as The Wire and the Village Voice.

For example, in the piece on Public Enemy, Reynolds manages to provoke analysis regarding whether PE represent ‘rock’ music or else: they happen to define themselves as hip hop as opposed to rock, although he feels vindicated by them teaming up with Anthrax a year or so later, a bit like Run DMC and another rock band, i.e. ‘Walk This Way’. This is perhaps less relevant than the fact that his provocative, thoughtful analysis makes the musicians think and talk about what they are, which is a very interesting subject for a book on music, given that ultimately it’s something we identify with (or not) in an almost primal way. His analysis of more recent soundwaves, such as Grime and Dizzee Rascal take this forward also. He studiously avoids the pitfall that lots of books on music are really just checklists of facts, which is boring: his defence of his interest on page 357 really does rack it up; his honesty is admirable and pays him dividends. Given the racial dynamics which Reynolds negotiates with great skill and care – he is somewhat reminiscent of Studs Terkel – this book furthermore stands out for me, a bit like Terkel’s ‘Race’, modulated through the medium of music.

http://bringthenoisesimonreynolds.blogspot.com

http://socialistworker.co.uk/art.php?id=11733

http://blissout.blogspot.com/

Digital Film-Making ::: Mike Figgis ::: Faber and Faber

Digital Film-Making ::: Mike Figgis ::: Faber and Faber

An excellent introduction to the subject: building on his previous record of ‘Projections 10’, ( interviews with actors, agents, film-makers ) and his straight up chapter in Soundscape: The School of Sound Lectures 1998-2001 ( Wallflower Press 2003 ). Incidentally, Mike Figgis was the man who filmed artist Jeremy Deller’s re-enactment of the battle of Orgreave, the notorious - and misrepresented - clash between miners and policemen in the miners strike of 1984.

Mr Figgis is extremely generous with his experience and expertise, going into detailed study of the practical nature of the process giving a thorough overview about the differences between celluloid and digital cameras, what this means for film makers, customising cameras, planning issues when making a film (budget and location), lighting, camera movement, actors, post-production, music and distribution. Very readable and very engaging.

http://www.faber.co.uk/book_detail.html?bid=39302

http://mantex.blogspot.com/2007/05/digital-filmmaking-mike-figgis.html

http://www.kamera.co.uk/article.php/897

http://www.gyford.com/phil/writing/2007/05/10/a_whores_profess.php#more